A Look Into Inner City Poverty - 2020 Words

A Look Into Inner City Poverty Inner city distress in the American economy is not the only pressing issue facing the nation. Lack of businesses and jobs in most inner cities fuels a crushing cycle of poverty and crippling social problems like crime and drug abuse. As the condition of inner cities continue to worsen, debate on how to improve them through such measures as education, financial and technical assistance has continued to grow. The sad reality is that efforts from the past decades to address the causes of inner cities poverty have failed. Attempts to establish a sustainable economy through the creation of employment opportunities, wealth creation, and improved infrastructure (Kasarda, 4) have not worked. These efforts have failed†¦show more content†¦Private investment is based on self-interest and a genuine competitive advantage, and as such will then be sustaining in the long term, and is not dependent upon federal funding programs. There is need to develop an economic model that will begin on the premise that inner city businesses must be profitable and in a good position to compete on regional, national and international scale. Several issues have led to social problems in the inner city. Sub-standard educational opportunities, high rates of unemployment, high crime rates, broken families, and inadequate housing characterize most inner city neighborhoods. In the 19th century, the inner city was the central point for industrial activities, among which neighborhoods were established with rows of terraced houses for the industrial based, low-paid workers (Wilson, 14). In the latter half of the 20th century, factories in the inner city were closed and relocated to suburban locations causing decay and economic decline in the cities they left behind. This economic trend created many social problems including poverty through lack of employment. As this trend progressed those able to move and follow the suburban jobs left the inner city, creating pools of disadvantaged minorit ies in their wake subject to growing social problem. These social problems will be examined in this research as to how they contributed to the high rate of poverty in the inner city. There is high rate of poverty in the inner

Summary Of The Crucible - 2006 Words

Nyonika Khanna Mrs.Evard Amlit - 5 09/28/2017 Man as a Puppet in the Hands of an Intolerant Society Scapegoating. According to Urban Dictionary, â€Å"a scapegoat is defined as, ‘A person or person or object that is used to lay the blame on for all that goes wrong, regardless of the contributions of others. This will usually carry on until the scapegoat has gone, or has managed to successfully defend itself against the arguments presented to it’.The pointing out of a person as an accused or a sinner happens because of the intolerance to any deviation from the society beliefs. This is seen in the play,The Crucible; articles Death Penalty Disgrace and A True Confession. In these articles, the main thing that stands out is that people can be†¦show more content†¦If I say I know something about the device, it’ll be be I lied, I’m screwed, but al least my family will be safe. ‘And I said, ‘OK, the device is mine.’† (Higazy, A True Confession). The agent who threatened him said that if he would not cooperate, his family wou ld be in a lot trouble. Under so much intense pressure he accepted to lie so that his family could be secure. But later on he was proved innocent as the FBI realized that he was not the right man they wanted. In the play The Crucible, the main emotion which led to loss of innocent lives was that of vengence. In this play, the illicit relationship between Abigail and Proctor became the source of frustration for Abigail, as seen when she says, â€Å"She is blackening my name in the village! She is telling lies about me! She is a cold, sniveling woman, and you bend to her! Let her turn you like a -† (Millar, 23). This frustration led to the emotion of vengeance which was so evil that it consumed whoever came in it s path. In Death Penalty Disgrace, Davis was put through a lot of emotional stress so much so that he was almost executed three times before being punished finally for something for which he claimed he never did. In this case ,the emotion of frustration played a big role as Davis could not get his due justice of being heard and the law makers became divided on the way his case was being handled.One of the law officer, who had helped in making a law forShow MoreRelatedSummary Of The Crucible 1151 Words   |  5 Pages6. Plot summary â€Å"The Crucible† is a play that takes place in Salem, Massachusetts in 1692. The play starts in the woods, the characters Abigail, Betty, Tituba, Mary Warren, and Mercy Lewis were casting spells in the forest. Samuel Parris catches them in the woods and Betty passes out. They go to the Proctors house to make sure Betty is okay. Parris is contemplating on what the town will think of him when they find out what has happened. He tells Abigail to tell him what happened in the woods. AbigailRead MoreSummary : The Crucible 1272 Words   |  6 PagesBlake Allison Period #1 AP NOVEL FORM 1. Title (underline): The Crucible 2. Author (first and last name) and date of first publication: Arthur Miller 1953 3. List four main characters with a one-sentence description of each. a. John Proctor- John Proctor, the husband of Elizabeth Proctor, is a serious farmer who lives on the edge of Salem hiding the secret sin of his adultery and disbelieving in the witch trials. b. Reverend Parris- Reverend Parris, the Reverend in Salem, is a conceitedRead MoreSummary : The Crucible 1074 Words   |  5 Pagestrue puritanism. Women ( specifically young girls) all had a huge impact on Salem that caused lies and new beliefs. 3 women were the main cause of all the sales madness and mayhem these women were Abigail Williams, Tituba, and Mary Warren. The crucible is about a group of girls who went out to dance or do other things which are unknown. They were then caught and accused of practicing witchcraft. They all started to make up things saying that they could see demons and that they would find themselvesRead MoreSummary Of The Crucible 1242 Words   |  5 PagesEnglish 11 D1B2 21 October 2014 Why is Extremism in Any Form Dangerous? I feel that extremism is dangerous because it can lead to intolerance, lying and hurting others. Misconception and fright can lead to prejudice. In Arthur Miller’s play, â€Å"The Crucible† people who refuse to admit to dealing with the Devil will be hanged. In fear of dying, people who have been accused but haven’t actually dealt with the devil admit to something they haven’t done in order to escape demise. Reverend Hale says to JohnRead MoreSummary Of The Crucible 978 Words   |  4 PagesSlave, it is a strong word that, according to the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, is defined as, â€Å"Someone who is legally owned by another person and is forced to work for that person without pay.†1 Plutarch describes the leader of the Rebellion (Spartacus the slave) as strong, invincible, and barbaric. Spartacus and his rallied men escaped confinement from the Roman Republic and fought back because they wanted to be free from the horrible situation they were put in. Also, the gladiators were tough andRead MoreSummary : The Crucible Essay964 Words   |   4 PagesOpportunities, Fall Semester 2015 Extra Credit Opportunity #4: Attend a performance of â€Å"The Crucible† on one of the following performance dates: Oct 10, 15, 16, or 17 at 7:30pm or the matinee performance on Sunday, Oct 18 at 2pm at the SMSU Fine Arts Theatre Note: The performance on Thurs, Oct 15, is free to all SMSU students with a valid student ID. Admission at all other performances is $10. â€Å"The Crucible† is a fictionalized account of events that occurred during the Salem Witch Trials. SalemRead MoreSummary Of The Crucible Essay711 Words   |  3 Pages Ms. Elliott AP Language and Composition 22 May 2016 Miller, Arthur. The Crucible. New York: A. Meyerson, 1953. Print. The Crucible, a play, by American playwright Arthur Miller, is set in the small New England town of Salem Massachusetts in 1992. The play opens with Reverend Parris praying beside his daughter Betty Parris s bed. In the bed Betty lies in some sort of paralyzed state. The town s doctor, Doctor Griggs, does not know of a medicine to cure Betty’s symptoms and advises ReverendRead MoreSummary : The Crucible 1624 Words   |  7 Pagesjournal #1- narrative Today I went into town in order to see what all this witchcraft commotion was all about. According to Reverend Parris his daughter, Betty, has been bewitched. All this sounds a bit crazy to me because the details do not add up. I see Abigail and hope not to make conversation with her, but eventually I am alone with her and she explains everything to me. She begins by declaring her love for me and how much she misses me and does not go a day without thinking about me. She thenRead MoreSummary Of The Crucible 1892 Words   |  8 PagesNoemi Boyd Etheridge AP Literature Per. 2 Nov. 25th, 2014 Title: The Crucible Year of Publication: 1953 Author: Arthur Miller Setting and Time Period: Salem Massachusetts during 1692 and 1693 Primary Characters: Abigail Williams - Niece of Reverend Parris, she is leader of the girls in town and has had affair with John Proctor. John Proctor - Husband of Elizabeth and a hard working man; tries to set Abigail straight by exposing the truth between them but is too worried for his reputation. ReverendRead MoreSummary Of Arthur Miller s The Crucible 1443 Words   |  6 PagesStephanie Provenzano 3rd Period 1. Title: The Crucible 2. Author and date of first publication: Arthur Miller, 1953 3. List four main characters with a one-sentence description of each. a. John Proctor, he is a farmer in his mid-thirties living in Salem, as a well respected man in society he sets an example to all of the other citizens; he is married to Elizabeth practice and has 3 sons. b. Abigail, she is a seventeen year old girl who lives with her uncle, Reverend Parris, because her parents

Command structure is one of th... free essay sample

Command structure is one of the most important aspect of any military operation. A clear and obvious command structure failed to manifest during Operation Anaconda. Confusing command relationships without a unity of command and a unity of effort along with overlapping responsibilities and conflicting command relationships brought tension to the mission. In the report Operation Anaconda Lessons for Joint Operations, Kugler states, Clear-cut command structures and command relationships must be established and understood by participating component units to ensure proper integration and compliance with planning directives (Richard L. Kugler, 2009). Operation Anaconda did not benefit from the command structure because the ground forces were located in the area of operations while the commands were in the Persian Gulf and in Tampa, Florida.U.S. ground forces The ground forces in Afghanistan were under the United States Central Command (CENTCOM) led by General Tommy Franks stationed in MacDill AFB, Florida. Command structure is one of the most important aspect of any operation, and from here the chain of command splits into multi commands with no clear control structure. We will write a custom essay sample on Command structure is one of th or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page This command structure caused breaks in communication affecting the basics of war such as surprise and maneuver. Richard Kuglers take on command structure is A hallowed principle of war is unity of command that is military campaigns and battles should be commanded by a single senior officer with the authority and staff assets to blend the operations of all components into a single, cohesive plan (Kugler, 2007). Army Maj. Gen. Franklin Hagenbeck the commander of the 10th Mountain Division, led Task Force Mountain, and his boss was Lieutenant General Paul Mikolashek, head of all land forces in the theater. General Mikolashek ran his office out of Camp Doha, Kuwait. CENTCOM named General Hagenbecks headquarters Coalition and Joint Task Force (CJTF) Mountain, in an attempt to give him additional control. In the paper Operation Anaconda Overview Hagenbeck oversaw all coalition conventional land forces, as well as some special forces, but did not command the air elements, CIA operatives or certain special operations forces in Afghanistan (Hawkins, 2013). This lack of control hurt the planning phase as well as the coordination of the mission; in the end, General Hagenbeck could only request airstrikes. Task Force 11 Task Force 11 commanded by Air Force Brigadier General Gregory Trebon, reported directly to General Franks. The task force, made up of the Army Delta Force and Navy SEALs, was a key unit for advanced force operations, conducting reconnaissance and strikes against high value targets. Task force 11 remained outside General Hagenbecks command, and communication and coordination between the two entities suffered.U.S. air component forces Lieutenant General Chuck Wald at the beginning of Operation Anaconda led U.S. air component forces; Lieutenant General Michael Moseley replaced him in early November 2001. There was not a forward air command element in Afghanistan; instead, the command ran the operation from Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia. The lack of commanders on ground led to vast confusion during the operation. Afghan forces Afghan forces led by General Zia Lodin operated under their own command structure not following the typical Army principles. Afghan commanders, Kamal Khan (K-Khan) and Zakim Khan (Z-Khan) would led their forces and would hold key blocking positions. The Afghan forces were deliberately left out of planning for the battle and informed of the operation only at the last possible moment in order to enhance operational security (Edgar Fleri, Ernest Howard, Hukill, ; Searle, 2003). Not being under U. S. command, the Afghan forces could depart from the original plan if they wanted to. They did in some instances, and hurt the operation in doing so. Commands CENTCOM worked from FL. through two subordinate commands, the Coalition Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC) and Coalition Forces Air Component Command (CFACC). Even with the advancements of technology, there is still a requirement for a forward C2 structure that ensures proper resources are deployed, situational awareness is maintained, and tactical operations are conducted effectively (Richard L. Kugler, 2009). Commanders need to have control of the situation and have awareness, despite having the technology of today. Coalition Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC) Army LTG Paul Mikolashek led Coalition Forces Land Component Command (CFLCC) from a base in Camp Doha in Kuwait. During the planning, a senior air operations liaison was not part of the staff until just prior to the battle, and they did not involve the air component in planning for the operation. When operations launch at a distant location, there is a lack of command and control, leaving a huge variable out of the equation. Coalition Forces Air Component Command (CFACC) U.S. Air Force Lt Gen Michael Moseley led Coalition Forces Air Component Command (CFACC) from his headquarters at Prince Sultan Airbase in Saudi Arabia. Not involved in the initial planning, CFACC did not make prior arrangements for fuel before the operation started. This left them scrambling to provide the necessary support when the operation order came out, trying to obtain the necessary supplies. During the first few days of the operation, CFACC retained command authority for all strikes, eventually turning it over to TF Mountain in the last few days. Task Force Dagger Army COL John Mulholland of Armys Fifth Special Operations Group led Task Force Dagger, working with friendly Afghan troops and spotted for the air strikes. TF Dagger maintained operational control (OPCON) over their air assets, but confusion arose over who actually had tactical control (TACON) of the AC-130s. With the multi-level command structure, questions arose and clear command guidance would have saved time. Conclusion A clear and obvious command structure failed to manifest during Operation Anaconda. The mission was an overall success in terms of mission accomplishment of clearing al Qaeda fighters out of the Shah-i-Kot Valley in Afghanistan per reports. Operation Anaconda did not benefit from the command structure because the ground forces were located in the area of operations while the commands were in the Persian Gulf and in Tampa, Florida.

Commercial Negotiation In Government Vs. Private Organisations

Question: Explain on Commercial Negotiation In Government Vs. Private Organisations? Answer: Introducation The public organizations and private organizations are distinct entities based on the underpinning structure. The platform foundation including governance structure, motivations, communication strategy, integrated risk mitigation strategy, and substantial co-location has helped in differentiating these two organizations (Walker Lloyd-Walker 2015). Without a doubt, commercial negotiation in private and public sectors are different. According to Kerzner (2013), in the public organizations, the aspects of political interference are evident compared to the private organizations. Collaboration offers stakeholders an opportunity to cope with uncertainty, risk, and ambiguity through the integrated contractor and client planning, problem-solving, and action. The commercial negotiations can be successful based on the form of collaboration among the stakeholders (Walker Lloyd-Walker 2015, p. 168). The relationship-based procurement considers important characteristics including behavioral factors, processes, means, and routines to enhance the enactment of PM practices. The success of this alliance depends on the level of collaboration among the parties, which should possess relevant expertise, skills, experience, and knowledge to handle such projects (Walker Lloyd-Walker 2015). Globally, there are different forms of collaboration including Alliancing in Australia, closer relationship-based integration of supply chain, integrated project delivery, and framework agreements. In the US, an integrated project delivery is common while alliancing has been used in European countries. The need for negotiation is to help project manager avoid blames in project implementations. This is achieved through incentive arrangements, mutual dependence, consensus building, and transparency and open-book (Walker Lloyd-Walker 2015, p. 169). Although this may not be easy with other stakeholders, an authentic leadership should embrace no-blame behavior thus creates foundation supports. In motivation and context, the substrate of circumstances should promote collaboration. The parties involved in the project seem to benefit from the relational rationale or relationship because of turbulence and change. References Kerzner, H 2013, Project management: a systems approach to planning, scheduling, and control, 11th edn. John Wiley Sons, Hoboken, USA. Walker, DHT Lloyd-Walker, BM 2015, Collaborative project procurement arrangements. Project Management Institute, Newtown Square, PA.