The reality of arms trade compared to its depiction in popular Essay

The ingenuousness of weapons trade compared to its depiction in popular Hollywood Movie - Essay Example weapons Trade has impeded the prosperity of this world and its negative effects are just increasing as it has become a nuisance for the well-being of the people.The global arms industry comprises of various governments and individual commercial companies who manufacture and sell weapons and other advanced form of military machine technology and equipment. This industry has grown in both volume and its reach. Now more and more developing countries are being served by these arms producing entities. A huge sum of cash is being spent on research, development, manufacture and supply of military equipment to the developing world. These defence contractors produce guns, ammunition, military aircraft, missile and other defense related equipment. Experts estimate that intimately 1.5 trillion dollars are wasted on the various military expenditures worldwide. Although the percentage has come down from 4% in 1990 to 2.7% at present, the volume has increased significantly and the sale has been focused more towards the economic tout ensembley divest countries. (Shah, World Military Spending) These countries lack enough funds to provide for the well-being of its people merely in some way they manage to spend a substantial amount of their GDP on defense budgets. The movie master of War does portray a true picture of the global arms industry existing in the world. Nevertheless, it can be argued that the degree of its reality is different since these things are hidden from the general public. The incidents render in this movie clearly highlight how in real life certain factors push nonpareil to betroth the worst of jobs. The life story of Yuri portrays him as a person caught up in a internet site where he has to deal in arms trade in order to give others a run across to protect themselves. His initial intention is to provide the people with a necessity of life, but later on he turns into an arms dealer who builds contacts and uses his networks to sell arms and ammunition without caring for the lives of others. The way the trade has been shown, where drive and power has been used to get hold of weapons, is a true picture of reality. Arms trade is one of the deadliest causes of chaos in the world. It not only allows military dictators to rule ruthlessly over the population but also gives them the power to continue their suppression and oppression over the suffering population. The deal that is struck amongst the arms lord and the dealer is usually of millions of dollars and both parties are completely unresponsive to the effects much(prenominal) transactions would have over the future of their nations. The use of such arms is highly questionable on one end these deals are struck to protect the people from the ruthless rule of their dictators, and on the other it is seen as a source of strengthening the grip of evil doers over the sufferer s. For instance, the movie story shows that it was unmixed that the deal between the African military ruler and the arms dealer would bring about a massacre of nearby villages and loss of thousands of lives, but still the deal was carried out. It is likely that the dealer is rarely touch about the interests of the people who will suffer as a result of these weapon deals. It has been debated also depicted in the movie that after the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991, thousands of AK-47 and other Russian blazonry flowed into the hands of arms dealers. Since it was lying idle in warehouses and military depots, Russian military generals illegally exchange them to arms dealers around the globe in order to make their personal gains. This surely resulted in the approachability of one of the best assault rifles of all times and was soon seen in the hands of mobsters and warlords on all continents. It is astonishing to know that around 76% of worlds total expenditure is accounted on defense budgets. This amounts to a humungous $1.22 trillion, out of which 42.8% comes from the United States. (Sipri, Recent trends in military expenditure) This reveals that no matter what